Cross-Cultural Evaluation of LLMs

Role: Lead author (in collaboration with Jialing Wu and Yingyu Cheng)

Advisor: Prof. Sachin Kumar

Code: View on GitHub

Status: In Preparation (Targeting Feb 2026 Submission)

Project Overview

LLMs excel at literal translation, but do they understand cultural context? In this project, we evaluated the performance of selected models on translating Chinese movie titles, which are dense with cultural idioms. We tested 3 prompting strategies: Title-only, Title + Synopsis, and Culture-aware.

1. Quantitative Analysis

We measured performance using 4 metrics (Cosine Similarity, BERTScore, BLEURT, and our custom CSI-Match) as shown below.

CSI Match Chart

Fig 1: CSI-Match Performance (Cultural Accuracy)

BERTScore Chart

Fig 2: BERTScore Performance (General Semantics)

2. Qualitative Analysis: Adaptation Strategies

We categorized every translation output into 4 strategies. The distribution below shows a heavy bias toward literal translation.

Strategy Distribution

Fig 3: Distribution of adaptation strategies (GPT-4 with Synopsis)

Key Findings

  • Context Unlocks Cultural Reasoning: Quantitative analysis revealed a massive performance gap between prompt types. Providing a synopsis alongside the title significantly increased the model’s ability to handle cultural items (CSI-Match rose from 0.64 to 0.80). Without context, models often hallucinated culturally plausible but incorrect meanings.

  • The “Safe” Literalism Bias: As shown in Fig 3, models overwhelmingly favor Preservation (56.8% of cases), defaulting to literal translations. While effective for simple titles, this strategy fails for idioms.

    • Example: GPT translated 《卧虎藏龙》as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon literally, missing the underlying idiom about “undiscovered talent”.
    • Success: However, when prompted with context, GPT successfully transformed 《天涯明月刀》(literal “Heaven’s Edge, Bright Moon, Blade”) into The Magic Blade to match “Wuxia theme” as the “heroic” genre tropes rather than using a stiff literal translation.

Technical Stack

  • Models: GPT-4, Llama 2, Gemini-2.5